Narrative on Data Analysis and Root Cause Identification

Checked Complete & Ready to submit

The Data Narrative section corresponds with the “Evaluate” portion of the continuous improvement cycle. In this section, you will construct a narrative that describes the process and results of the school's analysis of its data. The analysis reported here should justify the performance targets and actions proposed in the Action Plan section. This analysis section includes the following tasks:

1. Identify where the school did not at least meet minimum state and federal accountability expectations

2. Describe progress toward targets for the prior school year

3. Describe what performance data were used in the analysis of trends

4. Identify trends and priority performance challenges (negative trends)

5. Describe how performance challenges were prioritized

6. Identify the root causes of performance challenges

7. Describe how the root causes were identified and verified and what data were used

8. Describe stakeholder involvement in the analysis

Additional guidance on how to engage in the data analysis process is provided at the Unified Improvement Planning Website.

You do not need to enter any information on this sub-tab. The content below will automatically populate as you fill out the other sub-tabs in this section. Follow the directions on each of the following sub-tabs to complete your analysis. Alternatively, if you’d prefer, you can also directly edit these sections by clicking on the links included at the bottom of each section below (e.g., “Edit Brief Description Narrative”).

(Optional) As you complete each sub-tab, you may click the box labeled “Complete & Ready to submit” to help you track your progress through the UIP. If you would like to download an editable DOC file of the content of the UIP Narrative, click the “Download” button at the upper right corner of this sub-tab.


Brief Description

Description of the School and Comprehensive Needs Assessment

STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT AND PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
We sought to include as many stakeholders as possible in the development of this improvement plan, including our full building staff, our Pedagogical Leadership Team, our Parent-Teacher Group, and our School Accountability Committee (SAC). During the 2017-2018 school year, we met as a leadership team in September 2017 and with our SAC in September and November 2017 to review our previous years' Priority Performance Challenges, Root Causes, and Major Improvement Strategies and Action Steps. Additionally, we shared progress with the process with members of our Parent-Teacher Group during its September and November 2017 meetings.

Feedback from ongoing analysis during spring and summer 2017 with our pedagogical leadership team prompted the creation of a focused goals document, which we aligned with the major improvement strategies from the current Unified Improvement Plan (UIP) and which reflected Dos Rios' continued work toward becoming an International Baccalaureate (IB) PYP World School. This document, which we titled the Dos Rios Elementary Strategic Plan, is attached to this UIP as an addendum. It underwent numerous revisions this summer and fall in response to information received within our School Performance Framework and CMAS/PARCC student growth report. Feedback was sought from our full staff during professional development sessions in August 2017 and throughout the fall with our Pedagogical Leadership Team. Additional feedback and support with goal writing was provided by district level administrators.

Our Strategic Plan consists of three areas: Academics, Communication, and Tolerance (Culture and Climate). The targets are three academic goals and five focus areas for internal and external communication and culture and climate. The academic school goals are as follows:

Goal #1: By May 2018, all students will engage in Academic Discourse at least 50% of the time as measured by classroom observations utilizing the Student-to-Student Interactions Innovation Configuration.
Goal #2: By May 2018, all students will increase their writing proficiency by a minimum of one (1) level as observed through student writing samples scored by the Being a Writer writing rubric.

Goal #3:  By May 2018, 75% of all students in grades K-5 in mathematics and grades 2-5 in literacy will score at a level 3, 4, or 5 on the unit common assessment and in grades 3, 4 and 5 in mathematics and literacy on the School City benchmark assessment.

Since that time, we have updated our data tables (see addenda), which includes data regarding student demographics, performance, and growth from local and state sources and assessments. This included a review of data from the past three years to inform the basis of our current state and an analysis for root causes and data trends. Data included CMAS/PARCC state assessment results for English language arts, math, and science; WIDA ACCESS 2.0; and local measures including DIBELS and district-created common assessments. The state Preliminary School Performance Framework (SPF) for the current school year reflected a rating drop from Performance (2014-2016) to Priority Improvement (2017). Our entire staff participated in a root cause analysis to analyze the above data during fall 2017. Additionally, our pedagogical leadership team, consisting of a teacher representative from each grade level, school administration, our math coach/Primary Years Programme coordinator, and special area teacher representatives examined and analyzed the SPF and available current state and local assessment results. Our SAC team, including principals, teachers, parents and a community member met in September and November 2017 to examine the results and provide input into the development of our plan. Progress toward prior year's performance targets was compared to the Major Improvement Strategies and Action Steps. A team of school leaders including administration, teachers and instructional coaches, with support from district-level administration, was responsible for the writing and synthesis of the online UIP in its current format.

DEMOGRAPHICS
For the 2017-18 school year, the official count was 525 students. Enrollment from 2014-2017 reflects continued growth with a slight decline in the most recent year. Most recent data from CDE/SchoolView regarding mobility rates demonstrates increased mobility at rates well above state averages [2013: 17.6% (school) vs 16.2% (state); 2014: 16.6% (school) vs 14.5% (state); 2015: 20.8% (school) vs 16.5% (state)]. Enrollment by ethnicity remains relatively unchanged, with approximately 68% Hispanic, 26% White, <1% Black and approximately 4% other ethnicities, including American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian, Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and students identified as two or more races/ethnicities. Students qualifying for Free and Reduced Meals (FaRM) are slightly on the rise, from 78.4% in 2014, 79.2% in 2015, and 82.3% in 2016. 


The Greeley-Evans School District Six criteria for qualification as a Title I school is based on the percentage of families qualifying for free meals. This percentage is generally adjusted annually. At Dos Rios, a total of 65.12% families qualified for free meals, which minimally meets the 2016-2017 district criteria of 65% for Title I schools. Enrollment of English Language Learners is on a relatively flat three-year trend, reduced slightly in the most recent year. Enrollment of students involved in or identified as receiving special education services has grown slightly in the past three years. The enrollment percentage for students on an Individualized Education Plan in the most recent year was 12.5%, above the expected rate for a school implementing an inclusion model of instruction. Approximately 3 students are involved in or are identified as receiving gifted and talented services (<1%), which is also on a relatively flat three-year trend. Work at the district level reflects increased efforts to identify additional measures to equitably identify students for gifted and talented services in underrepresented populations and exceptionalities.
 
DESCRIPTION OF SCHOOL

Dos Rios Elementary School is now an Authorized International Baccalaureate (IB) school for the Primary Years Programme. IB schools share a common philosophy—a commitment to high quality, challenging, international education that Dos Rios Elementary School believes is important for our students.  We completed our verification visit in September 2017 and received notification in December 2017 that we met or exceeded all components of the IB Standards and Practices. Dos Rios Elementary is now an IB World School and is celebrating our 30th anniversary of the school's opening. Dos Rios currently collaborates with two other IB World Schools within the Greeley-Evans School District: Greeley West High School and Brentwood Middle School. Dos Rios values professional growth, and provides opportunities for staff to attend IB workshops, roundtables and symposiums when possible, as well as two grade-level half-day planning sessions per year supported by the IB Coordinator to reflect, refine and connect standards to planners that frame academic work. For further information about the IB and its programmes, visit http://www.ibo.org 

The mission of Dos Rios Elementary School is as follows: ''The Dos Rios staff, parents, and community are committed to empowering and encouraging students to become successful life-long learners and leaders in an ever-changing world. We will work together to create challenging and developmentally appropriate learning experiences that emphasize intellectual rigor and high academic standards. Personal integrity and democratic values will be fostered in our students to prepare them to become responsible, reflective and globally conscious citizens. ''

Dos Rios is a priority improvement school for the 2017-2018 school year.  As this is this first time in over three years that Dos Rios has failed to receive a performance rating, a core leadership team was established to quickly reflect on and revise school improvement efforts to significantly impact student performance and growth this year. This core team consists of the building Principal, Assistant Principal, Director of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment, and three instructional coaches with expertise in the areas of mathematics, literacy and writing, and Direct Instruction.  Support from this leadership group includes data team process refinement, creation of walk-through observation documents, coaching and curriculum supports, and data discussions.  A pedagogical leadership team meets weekly to closely monitor progress and implementation of the developed strategic plan (attached).  The strategic plan includes three primary goals: increased academic discourse through increased purposeful student to student interactions supported by scaffolds and structures; writing growth measured by student writing samples and supported through high-yield pedagogical practices; and increased academic achievement in literacy and math supported through focused data team cycles that meet weekly. Dos Rios values professional growth, and provides opportunities for staff to attend IB workshops, roundtables and symposiums when possible, as well as two grade-level half-day planning sessions per year supported by the IB Coordinator to reflect, refine and connect standards to planners that frame academic work. In December 2017, we also started monitoring student reading phonics and fluency progress through the development of data boards, which cross-reference DIBELS fluency data with our District Six created Phonics Benchmark Assessment.


STAFF QUALITY, RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION
Over the past four years, we have had 17 of our 35 teachers leave us for other teaching positions, opportunities, or retirements. With a growing student population and the fluctuation of our Title I status, we have added or replaced 27 teaching staff during this same period, which increases the need for ongoing professional development and constant retraining of classroom strategies and district curriculum.  As of August 2017, 17 of our 35 licensed teachers are in their first four years of teaching in our district. Fifty-percent of each of our grade level-teams are comprised of teachers newer to the profession and/or our school district. One hundred percent of our licensed teaching staff are highly qualified, as required by Title I.
Recruitment and retention has also faced some challenges within our classified staff due to an inability to maintain pay at local market rates. This was an area of need identified with a call for a Mill Levy Override (MLO) ballot issue in fall of 2016 and 2017. The MLO did not pass in 2016 but has since passed in 2017. Although these additional dollars will not fully address the financial challenges in hiring and retaining quality staff, it is a step in the right direction and also demonstrates increasing community support for our schools and staff.
 
SCHOOL CULTURE AND CLIMATE
In reviewing perception data from recent staff, parent, and student surveys (TELL Colorado staff survey; Spring 2017 District Six/Panorama Education parent and student surveys; 2016 Colorado Education Initiative Student Perception Survey) the following trends were noted staff and members of the School Accountability Committee. Staff and parents feel that increased communication and focus on climate and culture is needed. In addition to having new district curricula in reading, writing, and mathematics and the addition of the International Baccalaureate Primary Years Programme philosophy, a majority of our staff is new to Dos Rios Elementary, which has resulted in a shift in the existing culture and climate. Thus, there is a need for increasing teacher leadership professional development, collaborative team and vertical planning time, and opportunities for reflection to increase depth of understanding of the International Baccalaureate Programme of Inquiry, particularly with Category 2 and 3 IB professional development workshops.


Additional data analysis from the most recent spring 2017 student survey revealed that student perceptions of the Dos Rios Elementary experience is consistent with the perceptions of other District Six K-12 students and other elementary students, rating at or above in three of the four categories. The fourth was within 1% of the district and elementary averages. Areas of notice included needing to increase student-centered learning environments and teachers providing specific and meaningful feedback on student work. As a result, there is a targeted focus in five areas: collective leadership capacity, internal and external communication, climate and culture, creating a welcoming environment, and creating a more inclusive learning environment.

CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND ASSESSMENT
In the 2015-2016 school year, there were district curricula changes as well as assessment changes.  Curricula changes were in the areas of Reading, Writing, and Math.  With these changes, focus for professional development was provided for teachers in these three areas.  With these curricula changes, assessment changes occurred with Language Arts Common Assessment, Math Common Assessment, and Unit Writing tests.  Within the common assessments, changes were made unit by unit to ensure the assessment was aligned with the standards.  With these amount of changes for our district, building, and teachers, we know this impacted our achievement goals and outcomes, also resulting in inconsistent data points in content areas. 

In 2017, Dos Rios continues to use Reading Mastery Signature Edition (RMSE) for our core literacy program at the kindergarten and first grade levels. Grades second through fifth utilize Reading Wonders. Our writing curriculum, grades K-5, is Being a Writer. The math curriculum is Engage NY, published through Eureka Math. Additionally, staff have embarked on the writing, teaching, and reflecting upon transdisciplinary theme-based units of inquiry, in the development of a school-wide Programme of Inquiry, aligned with IB constructivist philosophy. With the acquisition of increased student electronic devices and content, students in grades K-1 now have access to ST Math and Zearn online content. Social studies and science content is also supplemented through Discovery Education. Teachers also have access to, but infrequently use, Reading A-Z. Calico Spanish is provided as a supplement to our IB PYP-required language course. Our Pedagogical Leadership Team identified Spanish as our IB ''Language B,'' with the input of parents, students, and the full staff in spring 2015.

In response to national (ESSA) and school district calls to increase an inclusion model for instruction and decrease pull-out instructional programs, more students are receiving instruction in their homeroom classrooms with help from specialized support staff. Teachers are planning and co-teaching through a variety of models, including station rotation. RMSE direct instruction groups at the K-1 level continue to operate on a research-proven model of leveled reading groups on a walk-to-read model within grade levels. Decreases in second grade phonics and phonemic awareness performance have prompted the development of an explicit phonics instruction reading intervention program for target instruction, utilizing Phonics for Reading and SIPPS (Systematic Instruction in Phonological Awareness, Phonics, and Sight Words). Students with Individualized Education Plans in grades 2-5 have access to modified content in a grade-level context with support from their specialist teacher, homeroom teacher, and instructional interventionists. English Language Learners who do not demonstrate adequate growth receive more intensive instruction in small groups during writing and or target instruction blocks.

Students are routinely and systematically assessed to inform progress and instructional planning using state and local assessments. State assessments include CMAS/PARCC and WIDA ACCESS 2.0. DIBELS Next is used through mClass in associate with the ELAT network for beginning, middle, and end of year literacy benchmark assessments and weekly, bi-weekly, and monthly progress-monitoring measures. DIBELS results and progress inform the identification and exit criteria in the development and support of READ Act learning plans. Kindergarten students are also assessed using Teaching Strategies GOLD on a trimesterly basis. Other assessments include locally-developed, content-specific assessments in English language arts (ELA), math, social studies, science, art, music, and physical education in addition to teacher-created formative assessments. Students in grades K-5 are assessed in ELA using a district-created Phonics Benchmark Assessment and in math using Assessing Math Concepts. All students in second grade are assessed with the Cog-AT assessment as a screener for gifted and talented identification and Advanced Learning Plan creation.
 
IMPLEMENTATION BENCHMARKS
Dos Rios staff attends professional development during six full-day planning sessions according to the Teacher Professional Development On-Contract Schedule and school plan. Topics focus upon explicit instruction of standards-based curriculum with district approved resources. Specialist attend content-specific ''Job Alike'' training with other district specials on an ongoing basis throughout the school year. Additionally, beginning in spring 2017, through the Greeley-Evans School District Innovation 2020 Strategic Plan and the English Language Development Masterplan of Success, professional development has been provided to our Culturally Linguistically Diverse team and building leadership team in the implementation of ''High-yield Pedagogical Practices'' through the support of WestEd. Thus far in 2017, these practices have informed the inclusion of Academic Discourse in the Dos Rios Strategic Plan as well as the development of a Milestone Document (see addenda) to identify and measure implementation benchmarks. The Strategic Plan and Milestone Document are tightly aligned to reflect a focus on three targeted academic goals, as previously identified above.


Dos Rios administration, through the assistance of district administration, academic and instructional coaches, and our Pedagogical Leadership Team, have developed clear and measureable goals with supporting documents to progress monitor our success in the implementation of our Strategic Plan and Action Plan. Teachers use these resources to team plan for grade level needs and address priority standards with integration into each unit of inquiry. 100% of all licensed staff have been trained in IB teaching practices, and 95% of teachers will have participated in professional development during monthly sessions and verify use of implementation through walk-through observations and data team analysis.

FAMILY AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
Relationships with our school community continue to grow stronger.  We host four Parent Education Nights throughout the year that average 120 or more adults and students during each event.  These meetings discuss topics such as ''What is Title I?''; language and writing to support the scientific process; inquiry, literacy, mathematics; parent teacher conferences; and state testing.  We also had several outside vendors at our open house and school kick-off events such as local health and wellness experts, public library representatives, local transportation specialists, and mental health providers. Parents also have increased collaborative opportunities with building administrators during the monthly ''Principal Tea.''
 
We maintain positive relationships with local businesses and organizations throughout the year which support student learning and programs at Dos Rios, such as our Parent Teacher Group (PTG), the Cornerstone Community Church, the Great Outdoors RV Company, Sonic, the Veterans of Foreign Wars Auxiliary, the University of Northern Colorado, Roma's Italian Restaurant, Farmers Insurance, and Rotary International. Through our work with IB, we have formed bonds with other area IB PYP schools, in addition to our vertical continuum partnership with Brentwood Middle School and Greeley West High School (GWHS). Students from GWHS have been instrumental in supporting IB through volunteer hours with the Renaissance Club.

TECHNOLOGY
Through financial support from District Six and our Parent Teacher Group (student fund raising efforts), we now have among the newest technology in the school district. We have also migrated to using Google, G-Mail, Google Drive, and Google Apps for communication and collaboration with stakeholders. Most staff now have Microsoft Surfaces, which allows them to wirelessly interact with content and presentation programs with students. The main computer lab is updated with 33 newer Dell desktop computers, and there are 147 Chromebooks available for student use. Most classrooms have 5-6 Chromebooks each, with a goal of 8-10 each in future years to enable use to more comfortably implement a station rotation model of blended learning with approximately one-third of students receiving online learning supports. Although many other Greeley-Evans School District Six schools are identified as ''blended learning'' schools, Dos Rios is not a blended learning school at this time.
 
With the support of our Parent Teacher Group (PTG) and the development of a technology task force, we have developed a five-year technology plan, which includes the addition of two LCD projectors, 30 external DVD drives, 30 wireless mice and additional headphones and mice, as needed, to support our updated technology need. In 2016, the PTG committed $8,000 to purchase an additional 30 student Chromebooks for the primary grades with an additional $4,000 earmarked in each subsequent year for ongoing technology needs.

STUDENT COURSE TAKING ANALYSIS
At Dos Rios, we strive for all students K-5 in all classrooms have the opportunity for quality Tier I instruction through a least restrictive environment. Additional Tier II supports are available through intervention provided through Title I.  Students who are academically below grade level in reading and math have access to supported learning through an inclusion model and or small group instruction to meet their needs and to acquire the necessary skills to meet the end-of-year grade level goals.  Students who are advanced are challenged also with small group instruction and digital content that advances their skills.

Students have many opportunities for extra-curricular supports and programs outside of the traditional school day. These included MAS (Mexican-American Studies) for students in grades K-5 in partnership with the University of Northern Colorado; a movement and music club ''MOVIC'' (grades 3-5); Hour of Code (grades K-5); Intramural sports (grades 4-5); two soccer teams sponsored by the Colorado Rapids (grades 4-5); and a Title I supported, spring academic after-school program, ''Flight School,'' focused on literacy and math through a study of aviation and flight (grades K-5).


STUDENT ATTENDANCE
Our average daily student attendance rate has traditionally held at or above 95% (see Addendum, Table 1). Structures are in place school-wide to celebrate positive attendance, and students and families with significant attendance challenges are provided with multiple supports in collaboration with outside agencies as part of the development of an attendance improvement plan.

STUDENT BEHAVIOR
In reviewing state-reportable and non-state-reportable behavior offenses from the past three years, there has been a dip and subsequent increase in combined student offenses. There has been a steady increase in the number of state-reportable events resulting in either in-school or out-of-school suspension, and there has been a dip and subsequent increase in the number of non-state-reportable events, which typically are resulting in re-teaching or the completion of a student reflection ''Refocus for Success'' form (see Addendum, Table 2). Dos Rios staff also use the Greeley-Evans School District Six anti-bullying curriculum to teach students the difference between tattling and telling in addition to problem-solving skills through a model of ''Stop, Walk, and Talk.'' Skills are reinforced through re-teaching in the moment.


During the 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 school years, there have been changes in administration, both in the capacity of assistant principal and principal. Additionally, through the work of our Positive Behavior Intervention Support (PBIS) program, we have also shifted away from the Well Managed Classroom/Boys Town Skills behavior response model to a hybrid model informed by IB philosophy and Rachel's Challenge. The growing philosophical shift aligned with the IB PYP program and Rachel’s Challenge places an emphasis on kindness, care, empathy and compassion. Work in the 2015-2016 school year realigned the behavior response pyramid with Rachel's Challenge and the district behavior matrix. Continued alignment in 2016-2017 reflected the increasing adoption and utilization of the language of IB through the IB Learner Profile attributes and IB attitudes. As a result, many of our PBIS systems now reflect the language of IB, including the following:

  • ''International Buffalo Bucks''
  • Principal Award Winners
  • ''IB Brag Tags''
  • Classroom, hallway, cafeteria, gymnasium, and playground expectations
  • Criteria for lunch with the principal
  • Differentiated ''Refocus for Success'' forms for primary/intermediate grades

In reviewing trends in student behavior with the PBIS team, approximately 72% of infractions occur either on the playground or in the classroom. Targeted supports in those areas include the adoption of the school-wide ''Buffaloes Act S.M.A.R.T.'' active listening strategy, Playworks structure for increasing inclusion and activity during play, and increased recess supports to result in decreased behavior referrals during lunch and recess.

Nine staff members attended Playworks training in summer 2016, and implementation of this program began in fall 2016. Although many 67% of those are no longer on staff at Dos Rios, improved systems developed through the School Health Improvement Plan (SHIP) with support of our Personal, Social, Physical Education (PSPE) team and school and district wellness teams have maintained positive physical and social practices during recess times. Increased recess supports include not withholding recess as a punitive response, increasing lunch/recess time, and providing additional supervision during lunch/recess. The latter is supported by our library media specialist and building administration on a daily basis.
 

[Edit Brief Description Narrative ]

Prior Year Targets

Begin Prior Year Targets

Current Performance

Review of Current Performance

In reviewing the Colorado Department of Education Preliminary 2017 School Performance Framework (SPF), Dos Rios is a Priority Improvement school. This reflects a significant drop in our school performance rating from Performance in 2016. In 2016 CMAS social studies assessment results were not used in calculations related to the 2016 SPF, and 2015 WIDA ACCESS results were used in calculations related to the 2016 SPF. In 2017, CMAS social studies was not administered at Dos Rios. WIDA ACCESS 2.0 results were not used in calculations related to the 2017 SPF. The 2017 School CMAS Growth Report reflected significant drops in growth percentiles across almost all disaggregated groups in the areas of both English Language Arts and Mathematics. Not including the WIDA ACCESS 2.0 data resulted in changes to the calculations in the 2017 SPF and an increased weighting of CMAS/PARCC growth data. Dos Rios students did not receive a single Meets rating on the SPF, as identified by any subject area or student group.

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT
Dos Rios students were rated as Does Not Meet state/federal expectations among the following areas and student groups as follows:
  • English Language Arts
    • ​English Learners
    • Free/Reduced-Price Lunch Eligible
    • Students with Disabilities (2016 and 2017)
  • Math
    • Students with Disabilities (2016 and 2017)
  • Science
    • English Learners
    • Students with Disabilities
All other Dos Rios students were broadly rated as Approaching state/federal expectations in the following areas as follows:
  • English Language Arts
  • Math
  • Science
ACADEMIC GROWTH
Dos Rios students were rated as Does Not Meet state/federal expectations among the following areas and student groups as follows:
  • English Language Arts
    • All Students
    • ​English Learners
    • Free/Reduced-Price Lunch Eligible
  • Math
    • All Students
    • English Learners
    • Free/Reduced-Price Lunch Eligible
    • Students with Disabilities
The following targets for Academic Growth for state/federal expectations were rated as Approaching among the following areas and students groups:
  • English Language Arts
    • Minority Students
    • Students with Disabilities
  • Math
    • Minority Students

For Elementary READ Act requirements, local DIBELS Next End-of-Year Composite Benchmark assessment data was used to measure improvement in the areas of decreasing the number of K-3 student with Significant Reading Deficiencies (SRD) and increasing the percent of K-3 students in scoring ''Benchmark'' on End of Year Composite levels. Dos Rios READ Act data shows a dip and then an increase in the percentage of students identified for plan development. However, the number of students exiting READ Act plans is decreasing at an insufficient rate to demonstrate an overall decrease in the percentage of students on a READ Act plan.  There is a need for continued growth targets in these the area of reducing the percentage of students qualifying for READ Act plans. 


MAGNITUDE OF CHALLENGES

Academic Achievement for English Language Arts, Math, and Science
Achievement measures indicated declines in all areas in the 2016-2017 school year, and the 2017 SPF rating was listed as Approaching overall. Dos Rios earned 0 of 12 indicators.  All areas remain significantly below the 50th percentile for state measures for achievement. There is generally a small rise in achievement in 2016 with a small decline in achievement in 2017 in these three tested areas based on state CMAS/PARCC assessment results. A similar trend was noted among DIBELS end-of-year Benchmark composite scores and district common assessments for ELA and math.

This is striking in the area of English Language Arts for students previously identified for a READ plan and for Students with Disabilities. Students previously identified for READ Plan on the 2017 SPF were not indicated as a percentile ranking; however, the latter group fell in the 1st percentile for achievement, and both had similar mean scale scores. Students with Disabilities were also in the 1st percentile in the areas of math and science. While other disaggregated groups fell short of meeting state expectations for academic achievement, relatively minor achievement gaps exist. The second most significant gap across all tested areas for achievement lies between our English Learners and All Students. Therefore, students previously identified for a READ plan in the area of English Language Arts, Students with Disabilities in English Language Arts and Math, and English Learners in English Language Arts, Math, and Science are identified as disaggregated groups for increasing academic achievement in the 2017-2019 school years. This trend is consistent with the 2016-2017 analysis of SPF data.


English Language Arts Achievement
A review of data obtained from state and local measures determined that overall school English Language Arts achievement is relatively flat (see Addendum, Tables 3 & 5). DIBELS data increased slightly, followed by a slight decrease in the most recent year, as measured by averaged End of Year (EOY) benchmark composite percentages. This slightly rising and falling trend is also evident in CMAS/PARCC data over the previous three years. In reviewing data from disaggregated groups, Hispanics continue to trail slightly behind their White counterparts, and English Language Learner (ELL) students perform significantly lower than non-ELL students, as do students with Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) in comparison with students with no IEP. On the contrary, students identified as Gifted and Talented (GT) significantly outperform all students.  Finally, students eligible for Free and Reduced Meals (FaRM) also trail behind the not eligible FaRM subgroup by double-digits (see Addendum, Table 7).

Targets in relation to READ Act Requirements:
Our first target will continue to be to decrease the number of K-3 students with Significant Reading Deficiencies (SRD) to 15% by End of Year (May 2018). This target was not met in the previous year. In fact, the percentage of students with SRD in 2017 more than doubled since 2016. This may be attributed to increased enrollment, including our most impacted populations: ELs, students with disabilities. In identifying three-year trends, we will continue to monitor this percentage as a cohort. 

Our second target
will continue to be to increase the percent of K-3 students in scoring ''Benchmark'' on End of Year Composite in DIBELS. For kindergarten, our Spring 2018 goal is 91% Benchmark on End of Year (EOY) Composite in DIBELS and 96% in Spring 2019. For first grade, our Spring 2018 goal is 72% Benchmark (EOY) Composite in DIBELS and 77% in Spring 2019. For second grade, our Spring 2018 goal is 65% Benchmark (EOY) Composite in DIBELS and 70% in Spring 2019. For third grade, our Spring 2018 goal is 66% Benchmark (EOY) Composite in DIBELS and 71% in Spring 2019. Individual grade-level trends related to READ Act are as follows: Kinder ''Benchmark'' = 86% (Decreasing/Not Met); 1st Grade ''Benchmark'' = 67% (Decreasing/Not Met); 2nd Grade ''Benchmark'' = 60% (Decreasing/Not Met); 3rd Grade ''Benchmark'' = 61% (Decreasing/Not Met). Spring 2018 progress monitoring data indicates positive growth across grades with anticipated increases in all four grades, K-3. Goal attainment is anticipated for the 2017-2018 grade-level goals. In identifying three-year trends, we will continue to monitor percentages for each cohort and will increase the individual goals as each annual target is reached.


Math Achievement
A review of data obtained from state and local measures demonstrate that overall achievement in math is relatively flat, on average, year over year, with the exception of a double-digit increase among 4th grade CMAS/PARCC achievement data between 2015-2016 (see Addendum, Table 4). In following students as cohorts, Dos Rios students have experienced a three-year decline in performance data. In reviewing data from disaggregated groups, there are similar trends to ELA data: White students are narrowly outperforming Hispanic students; ELL students performed significantly lower than non-ELL students (by double digits); students with IEPs performed significantly lower than students without IEPs--performance is 10 times higher for students without IEPs (see Addendum, Table 8). GT students significantly outperformed their non-GT counterparts, consistently scoring 100% Level 4+ in 2015, 2016, and 2017 (see Addendum, Table 8).

Academic Growth for English Language Arts, Mathematics, and English Language Proficiency

Three-year trend growth data is unavailable due to 2015 CMAS/PARCC assessment transitioning from the TCAP assessment. Overall academic growth in the 2016-2017 school year was abysmal. Median Growth Percentiles (MGP) from the 2017 School CMAS Growth Report shows a significant decline from the 2016 school year, in which MGP was at or above district MGP levels and at or near state MGP levels. Although Dos Rios slightly lags behind 2017 district MGP levels, it has fallen significantly below state MGP levels in every single calculated category with available data. Arguably, growth targets could be established for nearly every disaggregated group.

English Language Arts Growth
Growth data from the CMAS/PARCC ELA assessments demonstrated a decrease of nearly 15 MGP points for all students in 4th and 5th grades. The largest decline was among 5th grade students, particularly among White students and Males. This decline was also noted among district data; however, these two populations of students exhibited an increase in MGP at the state level (see Addendum, Table 9). Gifted and talented growth was not calculated due to a low N. 
 
Math Growth
Growth data from the CMAS/PARCC Math assessments similarly demonstrated decreases across grade levels. Again, the largest decline was among 5th grade students. Although the largest groups to show declines were White students, Males, and Non-Minority students, similar declines of 20+ percentile points were noted across almost all disaggregated groups. The most recent growth data demonstrated growth at or below district MGP levels and significantly below state median growth percentiles in all areas (see Addendum, Table 10). Gifted and talented growth was not calculated due to a low N. 

English Language Proficiency
Changes in the WIDA ACCESS assessment to WIDA ACCESS 2.0 kept MGP from being reported on the 2016 or 2017 SPFs. 2014 WIDA ACCESS data demonstrated increased growth as ELL students' English proficiency levels (NEP, LEP, FEP) increases. In all, 51% of ELLs across the three WIDA bands were proficient in 2014. As reflected in the Preliminary 2016 SPF, median growth for ELL students in 2015 fell in the 53rd percentile. A significant and appropriate percentage of ELLs advanced one (1) or more levels in the 2016 school year, as measured by WIDA. 100% of Level 1 ''Entering'' students advanced one (1) or more levels, 86% of Level 2 ''Emerging'' students advanced one (1) or more levels, 71% of Level 3 ''Developing'' students advanced one (1) or more levels, and 68% of Level 4 ''Expanding'' students advanced one (1) or more levels, resulting in 32 students who grew into the ''Bridging'' (Level 5) and ''Reaching'' (Level 6) levels (see Addendum, Table 11). Proficiency data for our ELLs was released from WIDA ACCESS 2.0; however, growth data from these multiple assessments is not available at this time. As such, this marks a baseline year for the new WIDA ACCESS 2.0 data.
 

[Edit Current Performance Narrative ]

Trend Analysis

Begin Trend Analysis

Priority Performance Challenges

Disaggregated Achievement and Growth for Students with Disabilities in ELA/Math
Dos Rios Students with Disabilities are significantly behind in the area of academic achievement in ELA and Math, in comparison to the state percentile rank ELA (1st), Math (1st). (Source: 2016 SPF and 2017 SPF). Students with Disabilities are consistent with district and state Median Growth Percentiles (MGP) in English Language Arts, but are well below district and state MGP in Math. (Source: 2016 SPF and 2017 SPF).

Extensive Achievement and Growth Declines
Dos Rios has experienced consistent declines in ELA and Math achievement, particularly for our 5th grade students in the 2015-2017 school years as measured by CMAS/PARCC (Level 4+). Additionally, the disaggregated groups of White students and Male students also experienced relatively flat growth (2015-2016) followed by steep declines in ELA and Math growth (2017) as measured by CMAS/PARCC growth in comparison to district and state Median Growth Percentiles. Students in almost every measured category experienced MGP declines from 2016-2017, often with double-digit declines. (Source: 2016 SPF and 2017 SPF; Addendum, Tables 3 and 4)

Disaggregated Achievement and Growth for English Language Learners in ELA/Math
Dos Rios English Language Learners have fallen behind their peers in the area of academic achievement in ELA and Math (Source: SchoolView; SchoolCity; Addendum, Tables 7 and 8) English Language Learners are well below district and state MGP in both ELA and Math. ELs grew in the area of ELA at the 34.5th percentile in comparison to their district peers (46th percentile) and state peers (50th percentile). ELs grew in the area of Math at the 32.5th percentile in comparison to their district peers (43rd percentile) and state peers (49th percentile). (Source: 2017 SPF). English Language Learners (WIDA ACCESS-2015) met state expectations for adequate growth earning three (3) of four (4) points eligible for this indicator. (Source: 2016 SPF).

Reflection of Priority Performance Challenges
Rationale for Performance Challenge Selection

While almost all student groups experienced broad declines in academic growth on CMAS/PARCC in the 2016-2017 school year, students in the disaggregated groups of English Learners, Students with Disabilities, and 5th grades in particular experienced declines in the are of academic achievement on CMAS/PARCC in the 2016-2017 school year. As was predicted in fall of 2016, failure to promptly address deficiencies across all assessed content areas in the area of academic achievement had resulted in a dropped in our school performance rating from Performance (2014-2016) to Priority Improvement (2017). In the area of growth, Students with Disabilities experienced a decline in Math MGP, while the broad groups of White students and Males also experienced declines in both ELA and Math. Students with Disabililties, White students, and Males represent a large portion of our assessed student body. Additionally, in the area of achievement, English Learners and Students with Disabilities continue to demonstrate a trend of the widest achievement gaps in both ELA and Math among student groups. Our 5th grade students have also shown a steady decline in the area of achievement in both ELA and Math. Again, English Learners, Students with Disabililties, and our 5th grade students represent a large portion of our assessed student body. As such, these challenges represent three areas which our School Accountability Committee and Pedagogical Leadership Team have identified as having a universal application to two targeted disaggregated groups of students (English Learners and Students with Disabilities) while also appealing to the challenge of extensive declines in both achievement and growth for multiple groups of students.

Magnitude of the Performance Challenges

As reported in the Preliminary 2017 School Performance Framework, there were zero (0) ratings in the areas of academic achievement or academic growth which received a single rating of ''Meets'' state expectations. Although the total rating in the area of academic achievement was listed as ''Approaching'' state expectations, the total rating in the area of academic growth was listed as ''Does Not Meet'' state expectations.  The magnitude of these performance challenges are indeed significant. Students with Disabilities perform at the lowest level in English Language Arts (1st percentile) and Math (1st percentile) based on these measures. Additionally, English Learners are the second lowest performing subgroup in both the ELA (9th percentile) and Math (15th percentile) and Science (6th percentile) based on state academic achievement measures. (Source: 2017 SPF) This also reflects a decline from the previous year for English Learners in both ELA and Math. Achievement gaps for both Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners (ELLs) are evident based on both state and local measures. 

 
Insufficient performance in English Language Arts and Math has been identified as a Priority Performance Challenge in our UIPs for many consecutive years due to not meeting state achievement expectations. Student growth as measured by CMAS/PARCC and WIDA has previously contributed to our school's prior Performance ratings in the past three years (2014-2016). However, a steep decline in CMAS/PARCC growth data in both ELA and Math in 2017 and the exclusion of WIDA ACCESS 2.0 data in the current year's School Performance Framework as resulted in a significant drop in our performance rating by two rating levels. The absence of WIDA data in the SPF calculation has resulted in increased weighting of student growth data as measured by CMAS/PARCC. As noted earlier, Dos Rios students experienced broad declines in academic growth on CMAS/PARCC in the 2016-2017 school year in every single category in both ELA and Math, with the exception of Students on an IEP in the area of ELA, which showed a modest gain of 1 MGP from the 36th percentile in 2016 to the 37th percentile in 2017, which was higher than the district (29th percentile) and just below the state (38th percentile). As such, we are within 2 points of a turnaround rating. (Source: 2017 SPF)

[Edit Priority Performance Challenges Narrative ]

Root Causes

Priority Performance Challenge: Disaggregated Achievement and Growth for Students with Disabilities in ELA/Math

Lack of Quality Tier I Instruction

Students lack Quality Tier I instruction tightly aligned to Colorado Academic Standards and CMAS/PARCC assessments.

Insufficient Data Team Processes

Teachers and administrators lack a targeted and timely data team process, unpacking standards in relation to unit assessments, identifying gaps in student performance, and adjusting instruction.

Insufficient Teacher Professional Development

Teachers lack knowledge and training regarding instructional practices including differentiation strategies and rigorous inquiry-based learning for students, in addition to building capacity within our leadership team to support implementation of these strategies within teams.


Priority Performance Challenge: Extensive Achievement and Growth Declines

Lack of Quality Tier I Instruction

Students lack Quality Tier I instruction tightly aligned to Colorado Academic Standards and CMAS/PARCC assessments.

Insufficient Data Team Processes

Teachers and administrators lack a targeted and timely data team process, unpacking standards in relation to unit assessments, identifying gaps in student performance, and adjusting instruction.

Lack of Experience with Vertical Articulation of Curriculum and Standards

Teachers lack experience with vertical articulation of curricula and standards in the areas of K-5 reading, K-5 writing, K-5 math, K-5 science and social studies needed to develop scope and sequence.

Insufficient Teacher Professional Development

Teachers lack knowledge and training regarding instructional practices including differentiation strategies and rigorous inquiry-based learning for students, in addition to building capacity within our leadership team to support implementation of these strategies within teams.

Lack of Quality Tier I Instruction

Students lack Quality Tier I instruction tightly aligned to Colorado Academic Standards and CMAS/PARCC assessments.

Lack of Quality Tier I Instruction

Students lack Quality Tier I instruction tightly aligned to Colorado Academic Standards and CMAS/PARCC assessments.


Priority Performance Challenge: Disaggregated Achievement and Growth for English Language Learners in ELA/Math

Lack of Quality Tier I Instruction

Students lack Quality Tier I instruction tightly aligned to Colorado Academic Standards and CMAS/PARCC assessments.

Insufficient Data Team Processes

Teachers and administrators lack a targeted and timely data team process, unpacking standards in relation to unit assessments, identifying gaps in student performance, and adjusting instruction.

Insufficient Teacher Professional Development

Teachers lack knowledge and training regarding instructional practices including differentiation strategies and rigorous inquiry-based learning for students, in addition to building capacity within our leadership team to support implementation of these strategies within teams.

Lack of Quality Tier I Instruction

Students lack Quality Tier I instruction tightly aligned to Colorado Academic Standards and CMAS/PARCC assessments.

Insufficient Teacher Professional Development

Teachers lack knowledge and training regarding instructional practices including differentiation strategies and rigorous inquiry-based learning for students, in addition to building capacity within our leadership team to support implementation of these strategies within teams.


Reflection on Root Causes
Beginning in 2014-2015, a root cause analysis was completed by the staff using the Five Whys Root Cause Planning Template protocol finding a needs for academic vocabulary instruction, vertical articulation in writing, and number sense and computational fluency.

Continued analysis of our changes in curriculum and instruction as well as adoption of the IB philosophy has addressed portions of the aforementioned root causes through the adoption of new reading, writing, and math curriculum in 2015-2016. Concurrently, these changes have created new challenges in addressing the perceived root causes with targeted action steps. New reporting procedures have also enabled us to view data with a smaller N, such as with the Students with Disabilities subgroup.

In fall 2016, our full staff and School Accountability Committee again performed a root cause analysis. This process was co-led by both administrators, again utilizing the Five Whys Root Cause Planning Template and the Four-Step Data Analysis and Dialogue protocols. This process was followed by a gallery walk, observing trends in identified root causes of local and state perception data, CMAS data, DIBELS data, and WIDA ACCESS data. This has resulted in further revision to our root cause analysis, as follows:
  • Focus on Quality Tier I Instruction: Students need quality Tier I instruction, focused on critical thinking strategies and increased exposure to non-fiction materials to build background knowledge. Students in need require appropriate Tier II instruction.
  • Teacher Professional Development: Teacher knowledge and training regarding new curriculum and differentiation strategies for English Learners.
  • Vertical Articulation of Curriculum: Vertical articulation of curricula in the areas of reading, K-1 and 2-5, writing, K-5, and math, K-5.
  • Reading Fluency and Comprehension: Students need regular practice in the Zone of Proximal Development with reading fluency and comprehension both inside and outside of the classroom.
In the summer of 2017, the leadership team engaged in training to support academic discourse and writing, which was identified by our district as a root cause to our collective district academic achievement.  From there, our Pedagogical Leadership Team developed strategic plan goals to focus on and monitor these root causes.  Our third goal measures academic achievement in literacy and math with the belief that increased use of language to learn will positively impact student performance.  An increased focus on the data team process will closely monitor student growth, and bring data discussions to a student level, identifying exactly who has moved and why they moved.  As there have been transitions with administration and staff, we identified a need for clearer expectations and a tighter data team process.

[Edit Root Causes Narrative ]

Additional Narrative / Conclusion

Add Additional Narrative